Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Cooperation and Conflict
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KEGLEY, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by HERMANN, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Political Psychology of `Peace through Democratization'

CHARLES W. KEGLEY, JR

MARGARET G. HERMANN

Many scholars and policy-makers have pinned their hopes on the expectation that in the post-Cold War world peace will be preserved if the diffusion of democracy continues. This hope is grounded on the demonstrable evidence that historically democracies have rarely, if ever, waged large-scale war to resolve their disputes with one another. Yet explanations as to why this propensity is exhibited have been unsatisfactory, and debate about the causes of `the democratic peace' as well as about the domain to which it applies have not resulted in consensus. Reviewing the empirical findings in this genre of research, this article examines a deviant case — the Reagan Administration's covert military interventions in the 1980s against established governments — to generate propositions about the heretofore neglected influence of democratic leaders' perceptions and beliefs on the linkage between democracy and peace. The implications for subsequent theory-building are probed to suggest how explanations and descriptions of the democratic peace might be improved by taking an expanded view of its preconditions.

Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 30, No. 1, 5-30 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0010836795030001001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. A. TURES
Democracies as Intervening States: A Critique of Kegley & Hermann
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2001; 38(2): 227 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
M. G. HERMANN and C. W. KEGLEY JR.
Democracies and Intervention: Is there a Danger Zone in the Democratic Peace?
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2001; 38(2): 237 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cooperation and ConflictHome page
C. W. KEGLEY JR. and M. G. HERMANN
A Peace Dividend? Democracies' Military Interventions and Their External Political Consequences
Cooperation and Conflict, December 1, 1997; 32(4): 339 - 368.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
H. Starr
Democracy and Integration: Why Democracies Don't Fight Each Other
Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 1997; 34(2): 153 - 162.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. Kleiboer
Understanding Success and Failure of International Mediation
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 1996; 40(2): 360 - 389.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. R. Oneal, F. H. Oneal, Z. Maoz, and B. Russett
The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict, 1950-85
Journal of Peace Research, February 1, 1996; 33(1): 11 - 28.
[Abstract]