Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Cooperation and Conflict
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KEGLEY, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by HERMANN, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Peace Dividend? Democracies' Military Interventions and Their External Political Consequences

CHARLES W. KEGLEY, JR.

MARGARET G. HERMANN

Numerous empirical investigations have found that democracies do not wage war against one another. This finding has inspired hope that the rapid worldwide dispersion of democracy since the mid-1970s will produce an era of pacific relations and has encouraged the active promotion of democratization. This paper inspects democracies' use of overt military intervention between 1974 and 1988 and shows that democratic states targeted military activity toward other free or partly free countries 141 times during this time period. Exploring the purposes for and the consequences of these interventions, the study concludes that under some conditions military interventions can affect transitions to democracy. However, it finds that more of democracies' interventionary activity is directed toward maintaining democratic identity and the liberal democratic community than toward its expansion. The inquiry ends by assessing the implications of the use of interventionism as a policy tool for democratization in the post-Cold War era.

Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 32, No. 4, 339-368 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0010836797032004001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Latin American PerspectivesHome page
W. Aviles
The Democratic-Peace Thesis and U.S. Relations with Colombia and Venezuela
Latin American Perspectives, May 1, 2005; 32(3): 33 - 59.
[PDF]


Home page
Cooperation and ConflictHome page
A. ANDERSSON
United Nations Intervention by United Democracies?: State Commitment to UN Interventions 1991-99
Cooperation and Conflict, December 1, 2002; 37(4): 363 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. PICKERING
War-weariness and Cumulative Effects: Victors, Vanquished, and Subsequent Interstate Intervention
Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 2002; 39(3): 313 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
M. G. HERMANN and C. W. KEGLEY JR.
Democracies and Intervention: Is there a Danger Zone in the Democratic Peace?
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2001; 38(2): 237 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]