Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Cooperation and Conflict
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FRIIS, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

...And Then They Were 15:

The EU's EFTA-Enlargement Negotiations

LYKKE FRIIS

The starting point of this article is a dual paradox: despite the fact that enlargement has been a recurrent phenomenon which has had a great impact on the integration process, we are endowed with neither a theoretical conceptualization of enlargement nor an in-depth understanding of how accession deals are negotiated in practice. The goal of this article is to contribute to the process of removing this dual paradox, first of all by conceptualizing any enlargement as a negotiation. By focusing on negotiations the article equips us with the tools to comprehend how the EU negotiates and what determines the outcome of enlargement negotiations. In order to clarify whether the enlargement-negotiation model does indeed capture the key factors which determine an enlargement negotiation, the article also ventures into the empirical field, analysing the EU's enlargement negotiations with the EFTA countries. On the basis of the theoretical model and the EFTA case, the article concludes that enlargement does not necessarily trigger more integration. Precisely because any enlargement is a negotiation, where the present member states have to leave the negotiation table `satisfied', less integration (spillback) is just as likely.

Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 33, No. 1, 81-107 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0010836798033001004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
F. Schimmelfennig
Strategic Action In A Community Environment: The Decision to Enlarge the European Union to the East
Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2003; 36(1-2): 156 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]