Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Cooperation and Conflict
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PATOMÄKI, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Beyond Nordic Nostalgia: Envisaging a Social/Democratic System of Global Governance

HEIKKI PATOMÄKI

Ole Wæver's 1992 article, `Nordic Nostalgia: Northern Europe after the Cold War', seemed to articulate the widespread feeling of the end of Norden. However, this argument is flawed and mistaken. Logically and conceptually it is confusing and tendential, and the evidence to back the empirical claims is casual. An explanation in terms of political economy starts from the observation that it was not the end of the Cold War but rather the end of the Bretton Woods system that gave rise to the redefinition of the Third Way already in the early 1980s. The problems of the Nordic model stemmed from insurrections against local relations of domination at the workplace; transformations of the occupational structures and class relations; the crisis of the Bretton Woods system of regulating the global economy; and the liberalization of the exit options of capital, among other processes. Starting with the critical realist idea that emancipation is `characteristically the transition from an unwanted, unnecessary and oppressive situation to a wanted and/or needed and empowering or more flourishing situation', I argue that emancipatory, globally oriented political action is a condition for the Nordic ideals to be realized and developed further under new conditions.

Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 35, No. 2, 115-154 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00108360021962039


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cooperation and ConflictHome page
C. S. Browning
Branding Nordicity: Models, Identity and the Decline of Exceptionalism
Cooperation and Conflict, March 1, 2007; 42(1): 27 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]