This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by LARSEN, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The EU: A Global Military Actor?

Institute of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Rosenborggade 15, 1130 Copenhagen K, Denmark.hl{at}ifs.ku.dk

The point of departure in this article is the question of why the EU's policy focus can be said to be regional rather than global in spite of having access to considerable capabilities and instruments in its foreign policy and why the EU has made such little use of the (modest) military means at its disposal so far. The approach used is a constructivist approach drawing on discourse analysis of primarily EU Council documents and the speeches of the High Representative Solana. Successful enlargement and a successful EU role in the former Yugoslavia are presented as the keys to a truly future global role. Moreover, it is shown that the dominant discourse in the EU in the 1990s constructed the EU as a civilian power drawing on political and economic means, which has to a large extent also been the case after the St. Malo Process. In other words, dominant framework of meaning at the EU level provides a possible answer to the EU's regional policy focus and its limited use of military means.

Key Words: actorness • discourse • EU • global military actor • integration

Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 37, No. 3, 283-302 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0010836702037003673


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Kavalski Venus and the Porcupine: Assessing the European Union-India Strategic Partnership South Asian Survey, January 1, 2008; 15(1): 63 - 81. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Kavalski Whom to Follow? Central Asia between the EU and China China Report, January 1, 2007; 43(1): 43 - 55. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Orbie Civilian Power Europe: Review of the Original and Current Debates Cooperation and Conflict, March 1, 2006; 41(1): 123 - 128. [PDF]

				S. E. Penksa and W. L. Mason EU Security Cooperation and the Transatlantic Relationship Cooperation and Conflict, September 1, 2003; 38(3): 255 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF]