Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Cooperation and Conflict
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HANSEN, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Globalization and European State Formation 1900-2000

BIRTHE HANSEN

Institute of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Rosenborggade 15, DK-1130 Copenhagen K, Denmark.bha{at}ifs.ku.dk

The article deals with the impact that the globalization process has had on European state formation in the period 1900-2000. Hypotheses are derived from the emerging schools of globalization: the hyperglobalists, the transformationalists and the sceptics. Is state formation hindered or stimulated by level of economic globalization? Indeed, does economic globalization have any effect at all? It is found that the still growing number of European states were formed in clusters following systemic change, that the probability of state formation increased in the case of candidates situated in zones of defeat, that nationalism did not play a decisive role, and that there was no connection between fluctuations in the globalization process and state formation. The hyperglobalist hypothesis is thus rejected, little support is found for the transformationalist hypothesis, but the sceptic hypothesis matches the findings. In addition, the article offers an explanation for the residual patterns found.

Key Words: Europe • globalization • nationalism • state formation • unipolarity

Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 37, No. 3, 303-321 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0010836702037003675


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?