This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Morozov, V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Russia in the Baltic Sea Region

Desecuritization or Deregionalization?

School of International Relations of the St. Petersburg State University, morozov{at}dip.pu.ru

Relations between Russia and the Baltic States — the weakest link in the Baltic Rim — have significantly improved since 2000. One of the explanations for this improvement is the fact that in contemporary Russian political discourse national identity is desecuritized. The role of the Baltic states has radically changed: they are no longer considered as an embodiment of the ‘false’, anti-Russian Europe. However, despite the desecuritization of national identity, security as the model of structuring and governing the ‘external’ world still dominates political discourse. The preponderance of the war against terrorism as discursive articulation, as well as the modernist nature of President Putin’s political project, leads to the marginalization of the Baltic Sea area on the political agenda. Some new departures in Russia’s policy as regards the Baltic Sea area are possible, however, once Russia has gone through its election campaign, and the enlargements of NATO and the EU are complete.

Key Words: desecuritization • discourse analysis • Estonia • identity • Latvia • Lithuania • Russia • security • terrorism

Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 39, No. 3, 317-331 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0010836704045207


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?