Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Cooperation and Conflict
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, M. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘What's the Use of It?’: Danish Strategic Culture and the Utility of Armed Force

Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen

Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Rosenborggade 15, DK-1130 Copenhagen K, Denmark.mvr{at}ifs.ku.dk

The article uses theories of strategic culture to show why Denmark has come to regard the use of armed force in new ways following the end of the Cold War. It is argued that Danish strategic culture is constituted by a debate between ‘cosmopolitans’ and ‘defencists’ about the utility of armed force. The debate shows that a minor power possesses a certain ability to choose how to act on the world stage, and what means to use in doing so, and illustrates that the prevalent structural explanations of why Danish foreign policy has been ‘militarized’ since the end of the Cold War are insufficient. In Denmark, a new focus on European integration and globalization has meant that military power is being understood in a new way. A practice of ‘activism’ has transcended the cosmopolitan–defencist debate that paralysed Danish security discourse in the late 1970s and 1980s.

Key Words: cosmopolitanism • Danish defence policy • defencism • globalization • Scandinavia • strategic culture

Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 40, No. 1, 67-89 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0010836705049735
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cooperation and ConflictHome page
J. Ringsmose
Paying for Protection: Denmark's Military Expenditure during the Cold War
Cooperation and Conflict, March 1, 2009; 44(1): 73 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JournalismHome page
N. N. Kristensen and M. Orsten
Danish media at war: The Danish media coverage of the invasion of Iraq in 2003
Journalism, June 1, 2007; 8(3): 323 - 343.
[PDF]

Home page
 Cooperation and ConflictHome page
C. S. Browning
Branding Nordicity: Models, Identity and the Decline of Exceptionalism
Cooperation and Conflict, March 1, 2007; 42(1): 27 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Security DialogueHome page
A. Wivel
Between Paradise and Power: Denmark's Transatlantic Dilemma
Security Dialogue, September 1, 2005; 36(3): 417 - 421.
[PDF]