This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by CARLSNAES, W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

On Analysing the Dynamics of Foreign Policy Change:

A Critique and Reconceptualization

The analysis presented here departs from the conventional conceptualization of foreign policy change in terms of input-output modes of analysis, here represented by two of its most recent and acknowledged practitioners. It is argued that approaches of this kind tend to fail on at least three counts: their account of the function of human agency in such change, which is not given the central role which this factor arguably deserves; their negligence of the agency-structure issue and its implications for analysing the dynamic interaction between decision-makers and social structures; and their inability to incorporate `learning' as an endogenous characteristic of foreign policy systems. An alternative mode of analysis is then presented which rejects the input-output imagery while specifically addressing the problems highlighted above. Although it defines the explanandum of foreign policy wholly in terms of agential behaviour, it includes structural factors as a crucial explanans and outlines a conceptualization of the dynamic nature of foreign policy which explicitly incorporates the reciprocal causal links between agents and structures, particularly in the form of the interplay — both adaptive and innovative — between institutions and discursive practices in foreign policy behaviour.

Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 28, No. 1, 5-30 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0010836793028001001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Rynhold Cultural Shift and Foreign Policy Change: Israel and the Making of the Oslo Accords Cooperation and Conflict, December 1, 2007; 42(4): 419 - 440. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. LARSEN The EU: A Global Military Actor? Cooperation and Conflict, September 1, 2002; 37(3): 283 - 302. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. KLEISTRA and I. MAYER Stability and Flux in Foreign Affairs: Modelling Policy and Organizational Change Cooperation and Conflict, December 1, 2001; 36(4): 381 - 414. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. BERNSTEIN, R. N. LEBOW, J. G. STEIN, and S. WEBER God Gave Physics the Easy Problems:: Adapting Social Science to an Unpredictable World European Journal of International Relations, March 1, 2000; 6(1): 43 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. LARSEN British and Danish European Policies in the 1990s:: A Discourse Approach European Journal of International Relations, December 1, 1999; 5(4): 451 - 483. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. BARNETT Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change:: Israel's Road to Oslo European Journal of International Relations, March 1, 1999; 5(1): 5 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. GUSTAVSSON How Should We Study Foreign Policy Change? Cooperation and Conflict, March 1, 1999; 34(1): 73 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. 't Hart Book Review Cooperation and Conflict, December 1, 1998; 33(4): 441 - 446.

				M. Muller South Africa's Changing External Relations Journal of Theoretical Politics, April 1, 1996; 8(2): 227 - 254. [Abstract]