This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by BUZAN, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Rethinking Security after the Cold War

This paper examines aspects of the debate amongst traditionalist, widening and critical approaches to Security Studies. It looks at how the security agenda has expanded away from the narrow military focus generated by the Cold War, and argues against the traditionalist criticism that widening the concept of security necessarily makes it incoherent. To carry this argument, it proposes a constructivist method for security analysis that offers a way of confining the application of security, and some reintegrative potential, to all three schools. In this approach, security is understood not as the content of a particular sector (military), but as a particular type of politics defined by reference to existential threats and calls for emergency action in any sector. The paper concludes by examining some of the political issues raised by any attempt to widen the scope of security, setting the liberal case for narrowing security as much as possible against the pressures to widen the security agenda that ironically arise from the contemporary success of the liberal project.

Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 32, No. 1, 5-28 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0010836797032001001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Atland and K. Ven Bruusgaard When Security Speech Acts Misfire: Russia and the Elektron Incident Security Dialogue, June 1, 2009; 40(3): 333 - 353. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. M. Behringer Middle Power Leadership on the Human Security Agenda Cooperation and Conflict, September 1, 2005; 40(3): 305 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Kaliber Securing the Ground Through Securitized 'Foreign' Policy: The Cyprus Case Security Dialogue, September 1, 2005; 36(3): 319 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Moller Book Reviews Cooperation and Conflict, March 1, 2001; 36(1): 141 - 143. [PDF]

				V. D. Cha Globalization and the Study of International Security Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 2000; 37(3): 391 - 403. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. AALTO Beyond Restoration: The Construction of Post-Soviet Geopolitics in Estonia Cooperation and Conflict, March 1, 2000; 35(1): 65 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. ERIKSSON Observers or Advocates?: On the Political Role of Security Analysts Cooperation and Conflict, September 1, 1999; 34(3): 311 - 330. [PDF]

				P. Roe The Intrastate Security Dilemma: Ethnic Conflict as a `Tragedy'? Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 1999; 36(2): 183 - 202. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. 't HART, E. STERN, and B. SUNDELIUS Crisis Management: An Agenda for Research and Training in Europe Cooperation and Conflict, June 1, 1998; 33(2): 207 - 224. [Abstract]

				L. HANSEN A Case for Seduction?: Evaluating the Poststructuralist Conceptualization of Security Cooperation and Conflict, December 1, 1997; 32(4): 369 - 397. [Abstract]

				L. Miles Book Review Cooperation and Conflict, December 1, 1997; 32(4): 427 - 429.